Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 20:21:13 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net> Cc: Boris Staeblow <balu@dva.in-berlin.de>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CTM <> CVSUP differences Message-ID: <199901180321.UAA43305@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 15 Jan 1999 20:46:23 EST." <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901152041370.558-100000@picnic.mat.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901152041370.558-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901152041370.558-100000@picnic.mat.net> Chuck Robey writes: : In terms of convenience, cvsup is supreme, but in terms of stability, : Poul's baby here is the champ, so you have to really consider other : places of corruption first. I've had problems when I get > 30 parts at one time on the fast list... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901180321.UAA43305>