Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:59:45 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port: NumlockX Message-ID: <20030929225945.GT47415@toxic.magnesium.net> In-Reply-To: <20030929104642.GA8813@watt.intra.caraldi.com> References: <20030909152452.GC10815@watt.intra.caraldi.com> <1063121517.50301.24.camel@jake> <20030929104642.GA8813@watt.intra.caraldi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> (09.29.2003 @ 0646 PST): Jean-Baptiste Quenot said, in 0.9K: << > I'm wondering why it always takes *ages* to change the ports tree. > Either the committers are not interested, or they don't have spare time > to handle such requests. >> end of "Re: New port: NumlockX" from Jean-Baptiste Quenot << This is why: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports&state=open&responsible=freebsd-ports-bugs # Adam -- Adam Weinberger vectors.cx >> adam@vectors.cx >> http://www.vectors.cx magnesium.net << adamw@magnesium.net << http://www.magnesium.net/~adamw FreeBSD >> adamw@FreeBSD.org >> http://people.freebsd.org/~adamw #vim:set ts=8: 8-char tabs prevent tooth decay.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030929225945.GT47415>