Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:07:12 -0700 From: "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@pinyon.org> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc Message-ID: <199902281607.JAA34678@psf.Pinyon.ORG> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:32:51 GMT." <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902280931360.47102-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
%On Sat, 27 Feb 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: % %> > I for one would love to see 2.8.1 or newer in the tree for my own, %> > selfish reasons. Many ports (new architectures) would benefit from %> > this. %> %> Is that to say that you prefer it over egcs 1.1.1? If so, why? % %I have found egcs to be slightly better at C++ code (for my own projects %anyway). I believe that it may produce better code too but I don't have %any real evidence. The ACE people recommend egcs. Taken directly from ~ace/ACE-INSTALL.html: "ACE/TAO don't seem to build well with g++ 2.8.1. We routinely use g++ 2.7.2.3, egcs 1.0.2, and egcs 1.0.3, and recommend those versions. egcs 1.1.1 is reported to be OK, as well." TAO is quite an exercise for a C++ compiler, and I build it just fine on -current with the egcs in ports. Russell To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902281607.JAA34678>