Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 11:04:13 +0900 From: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> To: andy@cgu.chel.su Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: doc/ tree tagging Message-ID: <86aejqo31e.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> In-Reply-To: In your message of "22 Mar 2000 18:06:41 GMT" <200003221806.XAA07272@mail.cgu.chel.su> References: <200003221806.XAA07272@mail.cgu.chel.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is my personal opinion, not a committer of Japanese Manpage Translation Project... At 22 Mar 2000 18:06:41 GMT, Andrey Zakhvatov <andy@cgu.chel.su> wrote: > Totally agreed. Branching is good for man pages, but for articles/books it > looks strange (better to use paragraphs about different OS versions). > And what to do with man pages? > What about: > 1) Create subtree exclusively for man pages (partially already > there - share/man), a-la doc/ tree (i.e. with different languages in mind). > 2) Move all man pages from utilities sources to this directory and track them > here. Ideally, translated man pages are good candidate for branching. But (as usually :-)) we cannot catch up multiple branches due to lack of translator (and reviewer). So if you are planning to translate manpages, please go for it with HEAD branch and think branching if you can handle both. :-) -- Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86aejqo31e.wl>