Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 15:37:00 +0300 From: Andrew Vylegzhanin <avv314@gmail.com> To: v.maffione@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>, "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru>, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: Is netmap jumbo frames broken in STABLE? Message-ID: <CA%2BBi_Yj7GFxErjtu=bxi_ppX%2BDHQ4dOXdm8s1LGWLQM5CncxsQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2B_eA9iSV=NjsaBWCYN2VGuvQvNvUh6fyDLvvmwHDJJAKTkkKg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2BBi_YhqCnt5pQ_hC5zWdBp24=Zn3Rcj29AwtMrguPhSoJZSdQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BhQ2%2BjcT_E4osrTB00%2Bf0gwSCoG_Zy%2BVdU8LXndqsjnmxPQ3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAFMmRNy=PEFOxM4tGM7TQqpMnhTba17ACiaOcfuG8fkDET0RZw@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BBi_YiqcOTw7T_dDzjis8yFu7oGd8G-av2BEaStXFiU7ovUCw@mail.gmail.com> <5756C17D.1090409@yandex.ru> <CA%2BhQ2%2Bjtd9FGuaJfJ6N1yt2%2BjSkez8Bj1usjpO%2BBCt-3Yvx2ww@mail.gmail.com> <1502708678.10983095.1465385308094.JavaMail.zimbra@ulg.ac.be> <CA%2BBi_Yhkw2JaGCgF%2Bo1BgLe=QmftneNM8mCrM4jo0OrYeoSGmw@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B_eA9iSV=NjsaBWCYN2VGuvQvNvUh6fyDLvvmwHDJJAKTkkKg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=D1=87=D1=82, 22 =D0=BD=D0=BE=D1=8F=D0=B1. 2018 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 13:42, Vince= nzo Maffione <v.maffione@gmail.com>: > > Hi, > Yes, absolutely, I'm currently working on aligning netmap on FreeBSD (head, stable/12 and stable/11) to > the same status it has on Linux (more features, more bugfixes, continuous integration infrastructure ... ). Great! > > In particular, on Linux jumbo frames are already supported on ixgbe, e1000, igb, e1000e, etc. BTW, what situation with ixl driver and chelsio ? > > > I have some netmap patches are already in the queue (see here https://reviews.freebsd.org/differential/query/Ol8MNtAi2AIs/#R), > so I can address the ixgbe-jumbo-frames item as soon as the queue drains. > If you want to give a try in the meanwhile, and/or test ixgbe on FreeBSD it would be great. > I will look forward to ixgbe-jumbo-frames. Of course, I'm ready to test on both stable's. > > Cheers, > Vincenzo > WBR, -- Andrew > Il giorno gio 22 nov 2018 alle ore 11:23 Andrew Vylegzhanin < avv314@gmail.com> ha scritto: >> >> Hi, >> >> Come back to subject after two years. >> I would like to clarify situation with jumbo frames in ixgbe driver. >> >> I've looked to >> https://github.com/luigirizzo/netmap/blob/master/LINUX/ixgbe_netmap_linux.h >> and see a lot of changes compared 11/12-STABLE version ixgbe_netmap.h. >> Is it possible to back port it? >> >> In general, is there a chance to get worked jumbo frames on ixgbe? >> >> -- >> Andrew >> >> =D1=81=D1=80, 8 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD. 2016 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 14:28, <tom.barb= ette@ulg.ac.be>: >> >> > Support for fragmented packets with ixgbe was recently added on the linux >> > version of Netmap : >> > >> > >> > https://github.com/luigirizzo/netmap/commit/fc1e77560a8a8ea93cc3594de5fae94= 334debcd3 >> > >> > I think the change for freebsd would be quite the same looking at >> > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/blob/master/sys/dev/netmap/ixgbe_netmap.= h#L396 >> > >> > After that, your userspace application simply have to check for the >> > NS_MOREFRAG flag in the receive ring, and if it's set he knows the end of >> > the packet will follow in the next buf. >> > >> > Tom >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > -- > Vincenzo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BBi_Yj7GFxErjtu=bxi_ppX%2BDHQ4dOXdm8s1LGWLQM5CncxsQ>