Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 Apr 1996 22:37:52 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        Brett_Glass@ccgate.infoworld.com (Brett Glass)
Cc:        terry@lambert.org, jkh@freebsd.org, bde@zeta.org.au, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: It isn't easy being "green"...
Message-ID:  <199604040537.WAA20986@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <9603038285.AA828590959@ccgate.infoworld.com> from "Brett Glass" at Apr 3, 96 08:55:53 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > 8-).  It's *illegal* in the US to tamper with this if you are getting
> > the tax break for the green-ness hardware (it's called "tax evasion").
> 
> Nope. The tax break only requires a certain percentage of machines to be
> "green." And "green" machines are only supposed to save energy while
> inactive.  Clearly, if you're installing an OS on the machine or using it
> to run tasks constantly or frequently (as UNIX does), it's legitimate (in
> fact, essential) to keep the hard drive spun up.

Yeah, but given "what idiot would leave it on for a desktop?", you
could quickly drop below the required percentage.  8-) 8-).


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604040537.WAA20986>