Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:04:57 +0100 From: Emanuel Strobl <emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Boris Spirialitious <hardcodeharry@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: AMD64 very slow! Message-ID: <200503230105.07139@harrymail> In-Reply-To: <20050322233806.25070.qmail@web90205.mail.scd.yahoo.com> References: <20050322233806.25070.qmail@web90205.mail.scd.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1689991.kEpptzGzB5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Mittwoch, 23. M=E4rz 2005 00:38 schrieb Boris Spirialitious: > I have opteron 246 system with 2 port intel em > card. We have test bed with about 200Kbs traffic > and we route through 5.3/i386 system. Load is > about 50%. With same settings, amd64 system run > with 85% load. How could be so slow? What tuning > extra is needed for amd64 kernels? 200kB/s sounds like misconfigured duplex/negotiation mode. But why don't you try FreeBSD 5.4-BETA1? Many performance improvements were= =20 achieved and stability is given in the -STABLE branch (BETA1 is a relese of= =20 =46reeBSD 5-STABLE) =2DHarry > > Boris > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. > http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --nextPart1689991.kEpptzGzB5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCQLKyBylq0S4AzzwRAp4ZAKCNz+TGfV4eKPTORFgK5OruR38FcwCffu6Q hNyAVDMgl2omaQXjZB6eb3k= =kgMA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1689991.kEpptzGzB5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503230105.07139>