Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:01:52 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de> Cc: danfe@freebsd.org, parv@pair.com, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm/fvwm2-devel Makefile pkg-plist ports/x11-wm/fvwm2-devel/files patch-configure Message-ID: <20050915170152.GA67825@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20050915173655.308a168d.lehmann@ans-netz.de> References: <200509132211.j8DMBYpj090708@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050914022354.GA7740@holestein.holy.cow> <20050914061957.GA13354@FreeBSD.org> <20050914222511.GA11455@holestein.holy.cow> <20050915131224.GB94650@FreeBSD.org> <20050915144634.GA65015@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050915150330.GW64690@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20050915173655.308a168d.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 05:36:55PM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote: > Stijn Hoop wrote: > > > Add BATCH=yes to /etc/make.conf along with WITH_FOO. > > Which could have other sideeffects then just preventing from parsing > OPTIONS. Correct. > I once thought about a 2nd options which prevents OPTIONS from > caling dialog and just printing the contents of it. I've spoken here that I wish the OPTIONS implementers would add NO_OPTIONS and NO_OPTIONS_<portname>. They said it was reasonable and I thought they'd look into, but no patches after a year. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050915170152.GA67825>