Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:43:11 -0600
From:      Stephen Hilton <nospam@hiltonbsd.com>
To:        <darryl@osborne-ind.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Arplookup - what gives ?
Message-ID:  <20030314114311.6edfa0cd.nospam@hiltonbsd.com>
In-Reply-To: <002301c2ea4f$c81301c0$0701a8c0@darryl>
References:  <002301c2ea4f$c81301c0$0701a8c0@darryl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:33:08 -0600
"Darryl Hoar" <darryl@osborne-ind.com> wrote:

> Greetings,
> I have posted several questions regarding an arplookup failure 
> message I have been receiving.  I have google'd until my 
> eyes are falling out, and have found nothing that explains
> how to FIX the problem.
> 
> I am running 4.7-stable on a box.  It is my firewall, nat box.
> ep0 is connected to my ISP's dsl.  ep1 is connected to 
> my internal private LAN.  My internal lan uses the private
> ip addresses 192.168.1.x.   I have two machines on my
> internal lan, not including the firewall box.
> 
> I am getting 
>   /kernel arplookup failure: 10.1.1.1 not on local network.
> 
> my ISP assigns a real IP to my ep0 interface usings dhcp.
> 
> what is causing this and how do I stop it ?  I have added a 
> rule to block 10.x.x.x in, but it has not stopped the messages.
> 
> I can ping 10.1.1.1, and if I down ep0, I cannot ping 10.1.1.1.
> 
> I have alerted my ISP to this problem (thought 10.x.x.x weren't
> suppose to be routed).

Darryl,

What IP addresses does your DSL router use, possibly 10.x.x.x ?

Regards,

Stephen Hilton
nospam@hiltonbsd.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030314114311.6edfa0cd.nospam>