Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 02:06:08 -0300 (BRT) From: João Carlos Mendes Luís <jonny@jonny.eng.br> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/83243: ruby-bdb compiling trouble Message-ID: <20050711050608.04D8317007@coe.ufrj.br> Resent-Message-ID: <200507110510.j6B5AHsC038846@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 83243 >Category: ports >Synopsis: ruby-bdb compiling trouble >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Jul 11 05:10:16 GMT 2005 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: João Carlos Mendes Luís >Release: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE i386 >Organization: >Environment: System: FreeBSD roma.coe.ufrj.br 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #2: Sun Jun 12 06:14:21 BRT 2005 jonny@roma.coe.ufrj.br:/usr/cvsup/RELENG_5/src/sys/i386/compile/ROMA i386 >Description: If I try to compile ruby-bdb with a Berkeley DB version 4.2 or 4.3, it does not work, does not find the libdb needed. >How-To-Repeat: I have WITH_BDB_VER=43 in my make.conf, and no other BDB related variable set. I think this is enough. The Makefile for ruby-bdb sets LIB_SUFFIX with the wrong value, then. IMHO, the Makefile should be teached on how to deal with this condition, since this is how we tell other ports to use BDB42 or BDB43. I may be wrong, of course. ;-) >Fix: The maintainer may have to choose between some options, and this could be very personal. I'll not suggest anything. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050711050608.04D8317007>