Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 09:15:30 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tilman_Keskin=F6z?= <arved@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Has anyone tested the jack update - am I ok to commit it? Message-ID: <4E759A92.8020107@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAGFTUwNMqpOcYLZCzbZ7tj5qqZF6UXm6zv-%2BH3ZxYNa9U9VQCA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAGFTUwNMqpOcYLZCzbZ7tj5qqZF6UXm6zv-%2BH3ZxYNa9U9VQCA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* b. f. <bf1783@googlemail.com> [2011-11-18 09:11]: > -- make the building of the HTML documentation an OPTION, > off-by-default -- the doxygen dependency, which by default drags in > many Python, graphviz, TeX, and Qt4 dependencies, is too heavy a > burden for package builders and testers, and it was never a good idea > to require it in order to build a small audio server. (These changes > could be replaced by packaging the documents in a separate, > locally-mirrored tarball, or, provided that the port is kept > up-to-date, by downloading them from the master site.) This would also fix the circular dependency reported recently on freebsd-ports (subject: "Circular dependency in devel/doxygen?"), so i think it would be useful to add it to the update. Otherwise i unfortunately don't have time to test it at the moment, so i would say go for it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E759A92.8020107>