Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 08:29:13 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, julian@whistle.com Subject: Re: Threads models and FreeBSD. Message-ID: <199911011529.IAA17050@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199911010453.XAA27221@pcnet1.pcnet.com> References: <199911010453.XAA27221@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > No, I want to be able to have multiple threads in a single process > > > be in kernel space. Only one can be running, but others can be > > > blocked. > > > > Agreed. My point is that if we allow multiple threads in a single > > process in the kernel space, it's alot worse than the present tsleep > > issues.... > > Perhaps I haven't thought this through enough, but why? See my other email on this topic, regarding deadlock and such... Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911011529.IAA17050>