Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:18:25 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Cc: fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting X11BASE Message-ID: <47BFD6D1.3020506@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <47bfd2d6.EvwzDqmqdVQnRjs8%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <47be74b1.pGW9HajDXl3VC5wx%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <200802221307.43940.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47bfd2d6.EvwzDqmqdVQnRjs8%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>>> * What is the value of LOCALBASE? I'm not finding any
>>> definition, or other reference, in /etc/make.conf.
>> Just set it to ${LOCALBASE} verbatim. Not what you think is the
>> value of the variable LOCALBASE but the word ${LOCALBASE}.
>
> Academic interest :)
>
> I'm finding it especially "interesting" that /etc/make.conf, which
> to judge from its location is part of the base, depends on a setting
> from something in the /usr/ports tree.
>
Well, actually it doesn't. What gives you this impression?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47BFD6D1.3020506>