Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:42:43 +0100 From: Bernard El-Hagin <zaphod@neostrada.pl> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: perl script question. Message-ID: <20040111094243.GA1114@hoth> In-Reply-To: <20040110233645.GA5668@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20040110221036.GA44130@tao.thought.org> <20040110223308.GA4881@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040110223907.GA16659@Uruk-Hai.Sanitarium.mine.nu> <20040110230218.GA5347@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <6.0.0.22.0.20040110182450.0a09ce58@pop.face2interface.com> <20040110233645.GA5668@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 06:26:30PM -0500, Marty Landman wrote: > > At 06:02 PM 1/10/2004, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > >On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:39:07PM +0100, Bj?rn Andersson wrote: > > > > > >> If this occures more than once on a line we should have the line as this: > > >> perl -pi.bak -e 's/\s+\w+_\w+\.?//g;' filename > > > > > >Good point. Also, if the stuff_separated_by_underscores wraps around > > >onto more than one line, then there may not be any leading whitespace: > > > > I don't see why the translate sol'tn that Gary Kline gave first isn't > > adequate. > > Err --- Gary Kline was the OP asking how to do this: I think you mean > Bernard El-Hagin's solution? > > % perl -i.bak -pe 'tr/_/ /' <files> > > That doesn't do the right thing. It turns: > > "This is a sample ordinary sentence. This_is_joined_up_with_underscores." > > into: > > "This is a sample ordinary sentence. This is joined up with underscores." > > but the requirement is to produce: > > "This is a sample ordinary sentence." Yes, I completely misread the question. Sorry. -- Cheers, Bernard
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040111094243.GA1114>