Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 26 May 2019 03:15:52 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 237855] print/fontforge: Update to 20190413
Message-ID:  <bug-237855-7788-JsrSQmtVNk@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-237855-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-237855-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237855

Naram Qashat <cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #204613|                            |maintainer-approval+
              Flags|                            |

--- Comment #3 from Naram Qashat <cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com> ---
Created attachment 204613
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D204613&action=
=3Dedit
fontforge-20190413.patch

* Update to 20190413
* Update distinfo
* Rework Makefile for FREETYPE option to extract from the print/freetype2 p=
ort,
to remove the need to chase that port's version all the time
* Shift some things around in Makefile to appease portlint
* Regenerate patches and remove patch-fontforge_splinefont.h
* Update pkg-plist

Changelogs:
https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/releases/tag/20190317
https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/releases/tag/20190413

Tested with poudriere for 11-i386, 11-amd64, 12-i386 and 12-amd64.

portlint still complains about an NLS knob, but the configure script for
fontforge does not have a way to disable using gettext.

portlint also complains about possible direct uses of gmake and python...
despite that those are just listed in USES. Not sure what is going on there.

The ports framework complains about a lack of LICENSE on this. I have no cl=
ue
what license to put on this. The LICENSE on the GitHub for the project says=
 it
is under GPLv3 but also simultaneously under a revised BSD license? Someone=
 who
knows licensing better than I can determine this.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237855-7788-JsrSQmtVNk>