Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:25:42 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/chinese/BBMan Makefile ports/chinese/CJK Makefile ports/chinese/arnettf Makefile ports/chinese/arphicttf Makefile ports/chinese/auto-tw-l10n Makefile ports/chinese/bg5pdf Makefile ports/chinese/big5fs Makefile ports/chinese/chinput3 ... Message-ID: <20050108192542.GB68193@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <2408A9749ABBBCC666386CDE@cc-147.int.t-online.fr> References: <20050108155045.568E716A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> <2408A9749ABBBCC666386CDE@cc-147.int.t-online.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 04:58:33PM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +-le 08/01/2005 15:50 +0000, Sergey Matveychuk ?crivait : > | Log: > | - Pass maintainership to submitter >=20 > I fail to see the point of such a commit, I mean, without any update to t= he > ports. Giving a port to someone making an update is good, but giving a wh= ole > bunch of ports just for giving them is doing no good I think. It gives me someone I can send my pointyhat logs to, so the ports don't just sit around all broken and sad. Kris --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB4DO2Wry0BWjoQKURApMAAKDUjgv+qwNVS6EcUeOleF6w6g+KcwCePVWu kZZa8cEtLgq0fA9SfV7iAlA= =b+fB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050108192542.GB68193>