Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 15:47:37 +0930 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, kris@obsecurity.org, lyndon@orthanc.ab.ca, Joe Abley <jabley@automagic.org> Subject: Re: Moving UUCP to ports Message-ID: <XFMail.20010918154737.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3BA6E56C.1121FBB5@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18-Sep-2001 Terry Lambert wrote: > Leave it alone, unless you can identify a vendor who is > maintaining it, and we can agree to select that vendor as > the "official" vendor of UUCP, from this day forward. > > Next people will be suggesting that we make /bin/ls a port... Except that 100% of users use ls. About 0%* use UUCP. * Straw poll from every person I've ever talked to about FreeBSD. --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20010918154737.doconnor>