Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:03:21 +0300
From:      Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Sam Lawrance <boris@brooknet.com.au>
Cc:        Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, sobomax@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports LEGAL MOVED UPDATING ports/www Makefile CVSROOT modules ports/www/linux-flashplugin Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/www/linux-flashplugin6 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/www/linux-flashplugin7 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr ...
Message-ID:  <20060410090321.GA99198@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
In-Reply-To: <56F2BA34-0F86-428B-9355-04B31F97061A@brooknet.com.au>
References:  <op.s7n7zl1s9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <44373C39.20903@FreeBSD.org> <op.s7ryswfh9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20060410.151635.21931503.hrs@allbsd.org> <op.s7r40ky79aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <56F2BA34-0F86-428B-9355-04B31F97061A@brooknet.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:56:03PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote:
> >
> >I am using FreeBSD ports tree on Linux.
> 
> Sounds terribly dodgy.

It does not matter. It's just an 'example' to show that the ports tree
is not necessary tied with FreeBSD in a means of a underlying OS.

I could be using the ports tree under DOS, Windows, irix and hpux :-o

-- 
Vasil Dimov
gro.DSBeerF@dv

Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence.
                -- Edsger W. Dijkstra



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060410090321.GA99198>