Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Mar 2017 05:43:42 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        gnome@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 217844] devel/gvfs
Message-ID:  <bug-217844-6497-GNIgXV6RhO@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-217844-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-217844-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217844

--- Comment #4 from Chris Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> ---
I'll not argue that you both make good points.
Because you do. :-)
My last experience with Xorg, on a (then) fresh install
of 11 (about 5mos ago). Was that it didn't work w/o
enabling HAL in rc.conf(5). I didn't verify that fact
on my now current && fresh install of -CURRENT (12).
I just installed/enabled it *assuming* I'd run into
trouble, if I didn't.
I had just set out to tackle the earlier work on
HFS(plus) for FreeBSD. That is, finish/bring it up to
current FreeBSD. But before I get too involved, maybe
I'll have a look, and see just "how bad" HAL(D) really
is, and whether reworking/fixing/... is/would be a
viable direction.

I'll give it a look, and report back (tomorrow(ish)).

--Chris

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-217844-6497-GNIgXV6RhO>