Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:58:48 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r458645 - head/textproc/jade/files Message-ID: <20180110145848.GA31640@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201801101450.w0AEoqj9050666@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201801101450.w0AEoqj9050666@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 02:50:52PM +0000, Jan Beich wrote: > New Revision: 458645 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/458645 > > Log: > textproc/jade: regen via "make makepatch" Can we please *not* do this just to please portlint(1)? Patches tend to come and go, they are volatile enough to simply let the old, unconformant ones die naturally. Regenerating them for no other purpose just creates unneeded repo churn and jeopardizes the history. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180110145848.GA31640>