Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:43:30 -0700
From:      Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [HEADSUP] portmaster/portupgrade support for new features
Message-ID:  <55F304B2.4020209@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150629092226.GL68142@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
References:  <20150629092226.GL68142@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--iVguM9xPic0qSoJoGNCHRJ1All4BK0Epg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 6/29/2015 2:22 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> hi all,
>=20
> A couple of new features are coming to the ports tree. The first of whi=
ch has
> landed in the ports tree and should not be used before a while, still b=
efore we
> start using it, it would be a very good idea to bring support for it to=

> portmaster/portupgrade. (I have already done the change in poudriere an=
d it will
> be in te next version.)
>=20
> So since recently we can remove the ${PORTSDIR} from all the dependency=
 lines.
> (Please do not use that syntax before all the tools are able to handle =
it!)
>=20
> Aka BLA_DEPENDS=3D pattern:${PORTSDIR}/category/port can now become
> pattern:category/ports
>=20
> I haven't checked portmaster/portupgrade code so I have no idea if they=
 will
> support that out of box or if they will need some changes.
>=20
> I would really appreciate to see people testing that and provide patche=
s if
> necessary so that the day we adopt this syntax those tools are already =
ready to
> use it ootb.
>=20
> FYI: https://github.com/freebsd/portmaster and
> https://github.com/freebsd/portupgrade
>=20
> Later more changes will be necessary to support upcoming VARIANTS (form=
erly
> known as FLAVOURS) and sub packages.
>=20
> This first step would allow you to step into the code of those tools be=
fore the
> having to deal with more intrusive changes :)
>=20

I have not forgotten about this. I plan to look into it in the next few
weeks.


--=20
Regards,
Bryan Drewery


--iVguM9xPic0qSoJoGNCHRJ1All4BK0Epg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV8wSyAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPPsEH/jx1/LvdD7s5EAZay2ss62bx
1GrH3nxqECSW1/SwCWt6GS6eUfL/IDjTHEVOI08HJd+59O6HluzcQDaumMQmjSXk
RMAFSfY5xUXMOY7QyoN1Qs7mV0dRxDiivV2S1zWS7OcrnF3hh3BpWkEse/M3ceQG
W08fogMfPFDE2d1Rg4dnavUExyKAArGj2Cq0sQmTMgJqyeR27HWocSvDgIvZKhQV
QPtXZdtJ+S8O11O0IrrGqzxk4Bx+IVt7sVuWWVXAF7t6Q+nPAXXwPktFRt16ZaVL
CAhwRpP/HohJLHQJT2qIiVagFMlNGXfTmGUEJ7PEsz7Mm1f76rmHh2/s0q/dqes=
=JFeZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--iVguM9xPic0qSoJoGNCHRJ1All4BK0Epg--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55F304B2.4020209>