Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:28:00 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, glebius@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fix return code for pipe(2) syscall Message-ID: <20060127202800.GB1388@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <200601271724.k0RHOUat034301@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> References: <20060127093602.GO83922@cell.sick.ru> <200601271724.k0RHOUat034301@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 12:24:30PM -0500 I heard the voice of Garrett Wollman, and lo! it spake thus: > > It is perfectly permissible for every system call to fail with > [ENOTADUCK] unless the first five bytes of the caller's address > space contain the word "quack". Ducks don't byte, they just nybble a lyttle. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060127202800.GB1388>