Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 19:20:29 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Imagemagick doesn't know about freetype2 ... Message-ID: <20010409192029.D2827@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <20010409111813.A20461@FreeBSD.org>; from ade@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 11:18:13AM -0500 References: <3AD1DA69.41F7B257@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0104091311120.72136-100000@mobile.hub.org> <20010409111813.A20461@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 11:18:13AM -0500, Ade Lovett wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 01:11:50PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > Okay, I might be missing something, but why is shipping freetype2 with > > XFree86 a bad thing? > > It isn't, if it's done right (full install), and the print/freetype2 > port is also modified to install into the exact same place. full install.. with the same compiler flags.. with the same run-time dependencies.. sounds like quite a lot of work no one would want to even try tackling (quite understandably..) G'luck, Peter -- This sentence no verb. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010409192029.D2827>