Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:05:50 +0400 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS-inly server and dedicated ZIL Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1304161603400.69185@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <516D2FA8.2000901@FreeBSD.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1304101713530.38433@woozle.rinet.ru> <D416AA98-D78A-4743-A1E6-AA2C28B9A602@bway.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1304121342090.58348@woozle.rinet.ru> <516CE8A0.3070808@digsys.bg> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1304161250360.89522@woozle.rinet.ru> <516D2FA8.2000901@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 16/04/2013 11:52 Dmitry Morozovsky said the following: > > Yes, but not pools with dedicated ZIL, as I cited from sources: zpool just does > > not allow to add ZIL to boot pool > > I think that there is no reason for that. Escuse me, ECANTPARS ;) No reason for disallowing ZIL on boot pool -- or no reason to have such config? > And a trivial workaround was already offered to you. Possibly I've missed that, could you please point me? What I definitely do not want is dedicating pair of expensive SAS as system mirror -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1304161603400.69185>