Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:51:33 -0500 From: Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com> To: Anton Blajev <valqk@lozenetz.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PPP+freeRadius problem. Message-ID: <20040220175133.GA70909@pit.databus.com> In-Reply-To: <1077298582.6182.10.camel@valqk.upper.lan> References: <1077298582.6182.10.camel@valqk.upper.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 07:36:23PM +0200, Anton Blajev wrote:
> Yep, 10x a lot it works when ppp gives the dynamic ips, but the question
> is still the same, how to do ppp to send NAS-Port and why it's not
> sedning it, and instead sending NAS-Port-Type = "Virtual"
> if this is not working then ppp is not sending the standart answer to
> the NAS... any ideas,
> it's not urgent (I'll be using ppp dynamic assignment) but I think this
> should be discussed becasue it doesn't work and it should... kinda bug?
NAS-Port is not required. From RFC2865 section 4.1:
An Access-Request SHOULD contain a NAS-Port or NAS-Port-Type
attribute or both unless the type of access being requested does
not involve a port or the NAS does not distinguish among its
ports.
NAS-Port is intended to specify the physical (modem) port on a dialin
server. It does not mean the UDP port from/to which RADIUS requests
are sent. The bug, if any, is in whatever is demanding that the
attribute be present.
--
Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf
I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040220175133.GA70909>