Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:57:02 +0100
From:      =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_Dvo=C5=99=C3=A1k?= <dandee@hellteam.net>
To:        "'Sergey Matveychuk'" <sem@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   RE: FreeBSD Port: cacti-0.8.7b
Message-ID:  <004601c87866$51a40480$6508280a@tocnet28.jspoj.czf>
In-Reply-To: <47C3ED7A.90302@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <000d01c87811$2c63bc10$6508280a@tocnet28.jspoj.czf> <47C3ED7A.90302@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you for your reactions.

I look forward to test your cacti-pluginst port in FreeBSD.

Bye

Daniel

-----Original Message-----
From: Sergey Matveychuk [mailto:sem@FreeBSD.org]=20
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:44 AM
To: dandee@hellteam.net
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: cacti-0.8.7b

Daniel Dvo=C5=99=C3=A1k wrote:
> On the 16th of December 2007, you wrote these sentences in UPDATING=20
> file about Plugin Architecture:
>   Plugin support is dropped again and will not revive anymore in the =
port.
>   A reason for that is the patch is unofficial and there are long time =
lags
>   between a new cacti version released and time when the patch is =
adapted.
> =20
> It is very pitty for us, becuase we use weathermap plugin to monitor=20
> and visualize the current load of our network.
> With your commit and after restarting of mysql server, our weathemap=20
> plugin is gone, and people ask me why this nice tool is not working.
> They got used to this nice maps.
> =20
> On the 12th of February 2008, unofficial patch Plugin Architecture=20
> have been released as a version 2.0, and it is adjusted or adapted for =

> 0.8.7b cacti, which we have in ports nowadays.
> =20
> Do you think that you could include this patch 2.0 to the cacti back =
again ?
> =20
> If you are not wellwisher for this, could you advise me how we can get =

> plugins back to cacti ?
> =20

Hi Daniel!

As I already mention, cacti team don't support the plugin patch and a =
patch author not so fast how we'd like. So I'm between two users group, =
one ask me update cacti ASAP and another (a little one) ask me to keep =
plugins support. I can't satisfy them both.

A good news is cacti team decide to include plugins support in future =
versions. Unfortunately it'll happen not so soon.

But can add a new cacti-plugins port if you'll test it (I don't use the =
plugin support).

--
Dixi.
Sem.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?004601c87866$51a40480$6508280a>