Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 03:19:32 +0000 From: Frank Shute <frank@shute.org.uk> To: Terrence Koeman <terrence@mediamonks.net> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Which mailinglist is appropriate for discussing uart changes? Message-ID: <20120220031932.GA66847@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <785970885da14a49ad39474dba0147a8@mediamonks.com> References: <785970885da14a49ad39474dba0147a8@mediamonks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 07:10:30PM +0100, Terrence Koeman wrote: > > Could someone point me to the right mailinglist to discuss adding > support for the MCS9904 chip to uart? I'm working on it, but I have > some questions regarding FIFO sizes and how they are currently > determined. >=20 > Thanks. >=20 > -- Regards, T. Koeman, MTh/BSc/BPsy; Technical Monk Hi Terrence, Looking at the list of mailing lists, I'd say your best bet is to send an e-mail to freebsd-net@ asking them if it's appropriate to ask the question there and if not where. uarts and FIFOs sounds like it's network stack to me and I'd guess someone on that list might be able to supply you with an answer. Regards, --=20 Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk9Bu8EACgkQHduKvUAgeK4eswCfbdYPdq4xcazP3H//IU3gCaNU OisAoI8RyFhnebKD+BMmDnnbb0lRnj18 =3/jR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120220031932.GA66847>