Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 13:37:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Make more things honor NOFSCHG Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0209061336470.5663-100000@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20020906223815.D10867-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Nate Lawson wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Ian Dowse wrote: > > > In message <20020905.112243.88255915.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes: > > > >Right now only libraries will honor NOFSCHG. Laying aside for the > > > >moment the whole !@#$!$#@^$#^ NOFOO vs NO_FOO bikeshed, I'd like to > > > >commit the following patch to make other places where -fschg are added > > > >to installflags. This allows one to more things over a mix of local > > > >file systems and NFS and have them work (right now if you build on a > > > >local fs, then try to delete it via nfs, it fails because one can't > > > >unset file flags over nfs). > > > > > > > >Comments? > > > > > > The following in make.conf works: > > > > > > INSTALLFLAGS_EDIT= :S/-fschg// > > > > > > Ian > > > > That is a useful tip plus I think Warner is right in making things > > consistent. Two for one special today. > > No thnaks. IIRC, hoek invented INSTALLFLAGS when I objected to cluttering > Makefiles with more special-case hacks. > > Bruce Ok, then his patch should _remove_ the old NOFSCHG checks. Consistency is still good. :) -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0209061336470.5663-100000>