Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:02:57 -0700 From: Chris <bsd-lists@BSDforge.com> To: Theron <theron.tarigo@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-x11 <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>, Greg V <greg@unrelenting.technology> Subject: Re: are there any working drivers for the i915? Message-ID: <84d35c251a722f617498c9e918a7ed6f@udns.ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <8c03bf7c-8fa2-17b6-02fb-a54473220652@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:50:05 -0400 Theron theron=2Etarigo@gmail=2Ecom said > On 2020-03-19 16:45, Theron wrote: > > On 2020-03-19 16:25, Greg V wrote: > >> Mar 19, 2020 7:54:14 PM Chris <bsd-lists@BSDforge=2Ecom>: > >> > >>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 23:21:30 -0700 Kevin Oberman rkoberman@gmail=2Ecom= =20 > >>> said > >>> > >>> Following your advice, I pkg install drm-fbsd12=2E0-kmod-4=2E16=2Eg20200221 > >>> ensure I have the module kld_listed in rc=2Econf(5)=2E Bounce the box,=20 > >>> and it > >>> locks up with a trap 9=2E > >> Don't pkg install, on 12=2E1 you have to build from ports for now=2E > > > > I thought this fixed itself since 12=2E0 reached EOL?=C2=A0 At least, the= =20 > > package was working for me in a 12=2E1-RELEASE kernel (but I've switched= =20 > > to current since then)=2E >=20 > Nevermind; looks like the real reason Chris should build from ports is=20 > that the host is 12-STABLE, not 12=2E1-RELEASE=2E uname(1) indicates 12=2E1-STABLE=2E But I think that given the revision is *just* before 357612 (tagged: 12-STABLE after recent LinuxKPI changes) that I'm missing a couple of key bits=2E I'm building an installer for this revision, as I write this=2E :) Thanks for the reply! --Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?84d35c251a722f617498c9e918a7ed6f>