Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:39:17 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Cc: jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, sonic2000gr@gmail.com Subject: Re: PACKAGESITE Message-ID: <487AA035.8070801@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <487a99e5.J/H87TLmSKivtwA7%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <48798b9d.0bgmwrViDqPyEGdk%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4879bdce.y5h8w8XA%2Bd8w3XuK%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4879C26D.1020901@gmail.com> <200807131016.31598.jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk> <4879D026.8060407@gmail.com> <487a99e5.J/H87TLmSKivtwA7%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>>>> As far as I know, pkg_add will only fetch dependencies recursively
>>>> from the Internet when used with -r but it will then ignore
>>>> PKG_PATH. Seems what you are asking cannot be done this way ...
>>> I wonder if portinstall -P (or even -PP) might do what the OP
>>> wants?
>> You are correct, according to the man page, portinstall -PP would
>> be his best bet.
>
> Except that portinstall is part of portupgrade, which has its own
> boatload of dependencies. Is there any way to do this with, say,
> portmaster?
Not yet. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?487AA035.8070801>