Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:29:42 -0500 From: Robert Hough <rch@solveinteractive.com> To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: annoying denied dns updates from lame nt/2000 servers Message-ID: <20010222122942.A46614@solveinteractive.com> In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010222115101.00aa29a0@mailhost.lightning.net>; from jreddy@lightning.net on Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:05:18 -0500 References: <3A909F0D.549C38D1@confusion.net> <GIEHKBHPBGKJPNMBCOHFEEHJCAAA.troy@psknet.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010222115101.00aa29a0@mailhost.lightning.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001, John Reddy wrote: > > What about a scenario of a user base of tens of thousands, via DSL, cable > modem, dialup, etc. Getting hundreds or thousands of customers with Win2k > running, and running dynamic update. Just curious, but couldn't you just use ip filters to block this stuff in the first place? Dirty fix for this problem is just remove the log messages from the source. In the ns_update.c, you'll find something like this: ns_notice(ns_log_security, "denied update from %s for \"%s\"", like I said, not exactly a graceful way of doing things, but hey - if it bugs/worries you that much... :) -- Robert Hough (rch@solveinteractive.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010222122942.A46614>