Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:20:07 GMT From: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/81248: [NEW PORT] mail/mutt-lite, a lite mutt package Message-ID: <200505191120.j4JBK723001400@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/81248; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> To: Udo Schweigert <Udo.Schweigert@siemens.com> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/81248: [NEW PORT] mail/mutt-lite, a lite mutt package Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 13:13:25 +0200 El Jueves, 19 de Mayo de 2005 12:39, Udo Schweigert escribi=F3: > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:40:43 +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > >>Number: 81248 > >>Category: ports > >>Synopsis: [NEW PORT] mail/mutt-lite, a lite mutt package <snip/> > > I wouldn't object to this, although I don't see why we need that as a > port of it own. If that is added to the tree I would highly recommend > that the maintainer of the master and the slave port are the same. > I don't put any MAINTAINER line on the slave port, so the maintainer is=20 the same of the main mutt port. The reason for this is to be able of doing 'pkg_add -r mutt-lite'. I use=20 mutt as a tool for admins in machines that does't have any compiler=20 installed (mainly dns/mail servers). =2D- josemi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200505191120.j4JBK723001400>