Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:56:18 +0000
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-stable-7@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Bruce Simpson <bms@incunabulum.net>, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r188727 - in stable/7: sys sys/contrib/pf sys/dev/ath/ath_hal sys/dev/cxgb sys/kern sys/modules/sem sys/sys tools/regression/posixsem usr.bin/procstat
Message-ID:  <499FF9F2.3030408@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200902180949.32691.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <200902171957.n1HJvqk8026145@svn.freebsd.org> <499BC43B.6030701@incunabulum.net> <200902180949.32691.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 February 2009 3:18:03 am Bruce Simpson wrote:
>> John Baldwin wrote:
>>> Author: jhb
>>> Date: Tue Feb 17 19:57:52 2009
>>> New Revision: 188727
>>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/188727
>>>
>>> Log:
>>>   MFC: Rework the lifetime management of the kernel implementation of 
> POSIX
>>>   semaphores.  Specifically, semaphores are now represented as new file
>>>   descriptor type that is set to close on exec.  This removes the need for
>>>   all of the manual process reference counting (and fork, exec, and exit
>>>   event handlers) as the normal file descriptor operations handle all of
>>>   that for us nicely.  It is also suggested as one possible implementation
>>>   in the spec and at least one other OS (OS X) uses this approach.
>> FYI:
>> This change *may* fix Python 2.6's 'multiprocessing' module on FreeBSD 
>> 7-STABLE, which is known to have problems there; it depends on POSIX 
>> semaphores to synchronize its IPC between different fork()'s of the 
>> Python interpreter.
>>
>> If anyone else has an interest in ths they may wish to test, if not, I 
>> will try to get around to it eventually.
> 
> When Kris tested it, it made things significantly better.  I'm not sure if it 
> resolved all the issues though.
> 

Some of the self-tests still failed, but there was confusion about 
whether the tests were broken or the kernel.

Kris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?499FF9F2.3030408>