Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 24 Jul 1996 15:29:01 +0200
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org, phk@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ccd ccd.c src/sys/dev/vn vn.c src/sys/sys conf.h src/sys/i386/isa fd.c mcd.c scd.c wcd.c wd.c wt.c src/sys/i386/isa/matcd matcd.c src/sys/kern kern_conf.c src/sys/scsi cd.c od.c sd.c st.c 
Message-ID:  <1252.838214941@critter.tfs.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 24 Jul 1996 20:26:07 %2B1000." <199607241026.UAA21158@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199607241026.UAA21158@godzilla.zeta.org.au>, Bruce Evans writes:
>>  Log:
>>  Make a "DWIM" function for adding [bc]devsw entries for bdev drivers.
>>  

>This broke wcd, which has bogusly different open and close functions for
>cdevs and bdevs.  Compiling LINT gives a nice warning that the cdev open
>and close functions are no longer used.

sorry, will fix.

>...  Thus the current interface is not worth preserving.

My conclusion was that considering that we didn't really like the current
interface very much, it was stupid to waste so much space on doing the
same thing over and over...

I sincerely belive it's time to get DEVFS kicked the next mile and get
rid of this problem once and for all.

Too bad about the crowd screaming for "persistence" in DEVFS :-(

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1252.838214941>