Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 09:59:29 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Looking for static analysis tool to generate call graphs Message-ID: <xzpu116cnm6.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040302221117.17237B-100000@fledge.watson.org> (Robert Watson's message of "Tue, 2 Mar 2004 22:18:31 -0500 (EST)") References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040302221117.17237B-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Well, using a scary combination of grep, awk, a long list of "omit this" > regexp's, and prcc from cflow, I got the following:=20 > > http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/20040302-sockets.ps > > Duck and cover.=20 Hmm, is there any way you can try to group functions with similar names together? For instance, functions whose names match /^fd.*/ call mostly eachother, and the graph would be a lot cleaner if they were placed close together. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpu116cnm6.fsf>