Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:38:36 -0400 From: "Tamouh H." <hakmi@rogers.com> To: "'Eric Anderson'" <anderson@centtech.com>, <danial_thom@yahoo.com> Cc: performance@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x Message-ID: <20061012163907.CBC0A43E07@mx1.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <452E6054.8000604@centtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=20 >=20 > Anyway, people should stop complaining, and start offering up=20 > hardware, net connections, and man power to support a cvs=20 > repo/packages/etc for the 4.x tree if they want it. That's=20 > what people do, and that's the beauty of open source. >=20 >=20 > Eric >=20 I agree, however, there appears to be no strategy or procedure for = FreeBSD testing. This has been asked on this group before. Are there any = standardized set number of tools we can deploy on FreeBSD to examine and = test for performance, bugs and compatibility ? Then we can use the reports from these tools to forward them to the = developers for further examination. Tamouh
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061012163907.CBC0A43E07>