Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 11:46:26 -0500 From: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Imagemagick doesn't know about freetype2 ... Message-ID: <20010409114626.B20461@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20010409191712.C2827@ringworld.oblivion.bg>; from roam@orbitel.bg on Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 07:17:12PM %2B0300 References: <3AD1DA69.41F7B257@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0104091311120.72136-100000@mobile.hub.org> <20010409191712.C2827@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 07:17:12PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> And what about the many ports in the tree which want to use FreeType 2,
> but do not really need X? Should they be made dependent on X then?
Of course not. You can, with a bit of imagination, force the a port
to install in ${X11BASE} without it being dependent on X.
The more rationally correct thing to do would be to disable the built-in
freetype2 support, and simply depend on print/freetype2. That way
everything works.
-aDe
--
Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. ade@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.FreeBSD.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010409114626.B20461>