Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 10:12:12 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A modest proposal for better errno values... Message-ID: <20030514081212.GA2301@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20030514080038.GC4366@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <3EC10099.3328.197DDF3E@localhost> <081901c319ab$18daa470$34f820c0@ix1x1000> <20030514080038.GC4366@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 06:00:38PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 07:55:14PM -0400, Michael Meltzer wrote: > >> #define EDOOFUS 88 /* Programming error */ > > > >#define E370HSSV 88 /* Programming error */ > > You might get this one past the suits if you can come up with an > appropriate acronym (one that keeps their mind off reading it > .(umop 3p!sdn > > My (non-tongue-in-cheek) suggestion is EASSERT - this is an assertion > failure that you don't want to abort()/panic() on. #define EDONTPANIC 42 /* ... */ -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030514081212.GA2301>