Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 11:10:58 -0500 From: "Jim Flowers" <jflowers@ezo.net> To: Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org>, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clamav with sendmail Message-ID: <20040208160539.M32772@ezo.net> In-Reply-To: <99DA0402-59C9-11D8-B162-000393681B06@lafn.org> References: <200402072146.i17LkKH7049671@elk.hughes.com.au> <99DA0402-59C9-11D8-B162-000393681B06@lafn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have had excellent results with clamav both with the milter that comes with it and as the sole virus scanner used with MailScanner. When used with MailScanner, MailWatch provides and excellent web interface for management and analysis of infected messages and Vispan (mailstats) provides additional daily/cumulative statistics. The MailScanner approach has been more robust but is probably more than you want unless you are providing spam control as well. -- Jim Flowers<jflowers@ezo.net> ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Sent: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 15:59:01 -0800 Subject: Clamav with sendmail > I am evaluating clamav for use with sendmail and an wondering if the > clamav-milter that comes with it is the best approach. There are > several other milter interfaces for clamav listed in the > documentation. Is there any reason to use one in preference to the > others? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ------- End of Original Message -------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040208160539.M32772>