Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 31 Aug 2001 09:50:25 +0100
From:      "Daniel Fairs" <d.fairs@psychmed.co.uk>
To:        <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   FW: ARP
Message-ID:  <FBEGIPGMEMLKMAGBBKCKEEMGCBAA.d.fairs@psychmed.co.uk>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry to reply to my own question. I am a dumb-ass.

ipfw add allow all from any to any via xl0

fixed it for the moment. Don't worry, I'll tighten that rule later ;)

I now have a nice natd/ipfw firewall (which needs more configuring, but
hey).

Cheers,
Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Fairs [mailto:d.fairs@psychmed.co.uk]
> Sent: 31 August 2001 09:27
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: ARP
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a problem setting up a FreeBSD-based firewall. The
> machine has three network interfaces:
>
> xl0: Internal interface (192.168.0.1)
> xl1: DMZ Interface (d.m.z.ip)
> xl2: External Interface (public IP)
>
>
> Currently, xl1 is not connected, I'm not worrying about it for now.
>
> I've got this machine connected to our ADSL router on xl2, and I
> can successfully ping and make connections to the outside world
> from the firewall machine. xl0 runs to a hub, and I have another,
> Linux-based, test machine on that hub, address 192.168.0.2. Now,
> from the firewall, I can ping 192.168.0.2. However, from the
> Linux box, I cannot ping 192.168.0.1, even when the firewall is
> disabled with sysctl (just to make sure packets are getting
> through!). When I do a tcpdump on the Linux box while running
> ping, I see arp request for who has 192.168.0.2 going out - but
> the firewall is not responding to them. Do I have to enable arp
> on xl0? How do I do that? Or am I missing something else?
>
> TIA,
> Dan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FBEGIPGMEMLKMAGBBKCKEEMGCBAA.d.fairs>