Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:47:33 -0500
From:      linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon)
To:        Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/misc/iso-codes Makefile
Message-ID:  <20051013014733.GA19572@soaustin.net>
In-Reply-To: <200510130045.j9D0jdf2087285@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <200510130045.j9D0jdf2087285@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:45:39AM +0000, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>   Having this port marked BROKEN prevents nearly 75 GNOME ports from
>   building, and I'm not okay with that. While Koop sorts out the
>   distfile situation and works on updating the port, I've temporarily
>   hosted the old distfile on MASTER_SITE_LOCAL, and I'm removing the
>   BROKEN and DEPRECATED lines that linimon added.

Well, I suppose this serves me right for committing when I'm not 100%
healthy.  You're right, I should have checked the dependency tree before
doing this commit.

However, I should note that after the first few hundred commits to clean
up port fetching problems, they all start to look alike -- and most of
the ones I've marked BROKEN have been for projects that have been dead
for years (most recent ones: early WAIS implementation; software
accelerator for XFree86 v3).

But I'll start double-checking.

mcl



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051013014733.GA19572>