Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 00:46:22 -0400 From: Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com> To: Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net> Cc: freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, Xin LI <d@delphij.net> Subject: Re: zfs_recovery=1, zdb, mounted pool? Message-ID: <CACpH0MdozEdZNQrz%2BbZfAnL-b-QH=Z1sCGxxjAA-4Xia-ZcVrw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3a38203a-e397-9695-b147-2fb46fa92d0a@delphij.net> References: <CACpH0Md01cwOTpbvaeGgEKWx3atfT8uZ3hAjJRbT4QQqDHShOA@mail.gmail.com> <3a38203a-e397-9695-b147-2fb46fa92d0a@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net> wrote: > > > On 8/14/16 13:04, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > > So... I found 319 of the errno 122 errors by running zdb. My question is > > this: > > > > Can I run with zfs_recovery=1 and have zdb fix these (which are free > space > > leaked errors) while the system is running? > > No. > > If I was you I would definitely do a full backup to a different place, > recreate the pool and restore from the backup. > > It's not safe to use your pool as-is, don't do it for everybody's sake. > So, then, do I start a big bug on this issue? Is there a bug on this issue? Seriously... it appears to have happened to multiple people.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACpH0MdozEdZNQrz%2BbZfAnL-b-QH=Z1sCGxxjAA-4Xia-ZcVrw>