Date: Sun, 18 Jan 1998 06:38:41 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no>, Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu>, gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: amanda port, empty PATCH_STRIP= lines causes trouble Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980118063403.10088A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> In-Reply-To: <199801180311.LAA07487@spinner.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 18 Jan 1998, Peter Wemm wrote: > I feel that it would have been far more appropriate to make a PORT of the > new patch to give the dust some time to settle rather than causing turmoil > in the base system. I personally believe the best thing would be to back > out the new patch ASAP. No, -current is right place just for new things integration. We'll forced to switch to new patch sooner or later, so better do it early. The only serious difference with old patch is 1) no backups made without -b 2) -p rules changed. see patch(1) In case you care about CVS Index'es, both new and old 'patch' behave _equally_ here. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nietzsche.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980118063403.10088A-100000>