Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:32:39 +0100 From: Philip Paeps <philip@freebsd.org> To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha Message-ID: <20050315103239.GG696@loge.nixsys.be> In-Reply-To: <20050315110501.B98189@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <20050315092801.840557306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20050315100007.GF696@loge.nixsys.be> <20050315110501.B98189@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2005-03-15 11:06:53 (+0100), Harti Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de> wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Philip Paeps wrote: > > On 2005-03-15 04:28:01 (-0500), FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > [...] > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Ugh, looks like I broke this... > > > > Is there a special magical format to use to printf a time_t without having > > it break on at least one of the architectures we support? > > The best I've found so far to print an integer type of unknown size is to > cast it to either intmax_t or uintmax_t and print it using %jd or %ju. This > requires that you at least know the signedness. That seems to work, thanks! Just testing this on beast to make sure. - Philip -- Philip Paeps Calm down ... it is only ones and zeros philip@freebsd.org A bird in the hand is dead.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050315103239.GG696>