Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 17:29:46 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> To: jd1008 <jd1008@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, postmaster@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Undeliverable: Re: sh[it] and What am I missing here? Message-ID: <20160606170212.P15883@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <mailman.394.1465157614.79513.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> References: <mailman.394.1465157614.79513.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 626, Issue 8, Message: 21 On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 12:40:27 -0600 jd1008 <jd1008@gmail.com> > Why am I getting this after I reply to a post? > The list must have a subscriber who is on a spamming server. > If this continues, I believe I may have to unsubscribe to > protect my machine from possible malware. > > > Yo > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Undeliverable: Re: sh[it] and What am I missing here? > Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 13:36:55 -0500 > From: Postmaster <postmaster@snaffler-net.bounceio.net> > To: jd1008@gmail.com [..] > There was a problem delivering your email to: > > > krad@snaffler.net Please DO NOT FORWARD spam and related material to this (or any) list. Then other people will lazily top-post and quote the whole bloody lot again, and again .. as just amply demonstrated. If you have any sort of problem with spam, or this sort of issue - that comes up here repeatedly - the correct thing to do is to forward the mail in question - including absolutely ALL of the mail headers - to postmaster@freebsd.org It is pointless, and annoying, to say "will someone pleae unsubscribe so-and-so from the list." Postmaster is responsible for _scores_ of lists, and certainly hasn't time to read this one. Direct mail to postmaster@, with sufficient detail to actually reveal the problem, usually has good results in my experience. Deleting all the crap, at the bottom of your (digest) message was: > -------------- next part -------------- > An embedded message was scrubbed... > From: jd1008 <jd1008@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: sh[it] and What am I missing here? > Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 12:26:28 -0600 > Size: 7858 > URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20160605/8f39576e/attachment-0001.eml>; If you download that attachment you than have all the headers needed by postmaster@ to see the problem delivery. Hint: the message was actually Delivered-To: chrisscott1066@tiscali.co.uk Received: from cm12gb1 (10.101.251.12) by mail.svcgb1.int.opaltelecom.net (8.6.141.03) id 574E52E2004546F2 for chris_scott@ukgateway.net; Sun, 5 Jun 2016 19:26:59 +0100 Received: from mx2.freebsd.org ([8.8.178.116]) by mx.talktalk.net with SMTP id 9clFbbvm5kpdi9clGbuKNn; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 19:26:59 +0100 X-Delivered-To: chris_scott@ukgateway.net Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D77E6CAA2; Sun, 5 Jun 2016 18:26:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org) And as you'll see, went through a very circuitous path, via some very screwy looking servers .. note this one: X-SMTP-MAILFROM: <srs0=hysflox2=r5=freebsd.org=owner-freebsd-questions@tiscali.co.uk> Seems tiscali.co.uk is in the mix; owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org was the original sender, so that one at least is forged. I'll do you the favour of copying this mail to postmaster@freebsd.org but in future please don't spam the list with this sort of stuff, ta! Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160606170212.P15883>