Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:15:01 +0200
From:      Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
To:        Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>
Cc:        rdivacky@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: flash
Message-ID:  <20070703161501.qwjd1zki880cw8gg@webmail.leidinger.net>
In-Reply-To: <18058.15563.387753.41553@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
References:  <54357.74.64.6.149.1183317914.squirrel@mail.el.net> <468801C4.7030105@walsimou.com> <87ir92sxbp.fsf@zeus.crashmail.de> <4689FC40.4010100@FreeBSD.org> <576dcbc20707030421q7a19c106gf9a7ebcaa9193639@mail.gmail.com> <468A39E3.4080709@FreeBSD.org> <18058.15563.387753.41553@jerusalem.litteratus.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> (from Tue, 3 Jul 2007 =20
08:10:51 -0400):

>
> Sergey Matveychuk writes:
>
>>  > Will flash9 not be crashed in freebsd7.0 with linux2.6 ABI?
>>
>>  Well, it was 7.0, but I don't remember I've tested it either
>>  before or after updating to linux 2.6. I'll test it again to be
>>  sure.
>
> =09My -CURRENT box has 2.6 installed, and flash-9 still has
> problems.

If someone is interested in tracking down the problem: You need to =20
enable the linux debugging and maybe add some more printf()s to =20
strategic (depends upon your own investigation) places. When you know =20
where it fails (and maybe why), you can report it on emulation@ and =20
Roman will try to fix the problem.

Interested souls can have a look at the archives of emulation =20
regarding the debug stuff (or ask on emulation@ if it is not easy to =20
find).

Bye,
Alexander.

--=20
Acid absorbs 47 times its own weight in excess Reality.

http://www.Leidinger.net    Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org       netchild @ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID =3D 72077137



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070703161501.qwjd1zki880cw8gg>