Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Jun 1999 08:15:03 -0700
From:      Doug <DougGuy@dal.net>
To:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Cc:        Doug <Doug@gorean.org>, "Brian F. Feldman" <green@unixhelp.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: New ATA stuff, questions and comment
Message-ID:  <37724B77.781378DB@dal.net>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9906231413180.7457-100000@dt054n86.san.rr.com> <xzpbte5wwye.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> 
> Doug <Doug@gorean.org> writes:
> > On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> > > A device name isn't necessarily the same as a device node, you know.
> >       Actually I do know that, but I've never come across a situation in
> > freebsd where I would call something one thing in my kernel config file
> > and something else in /dev.
> 
> man bpf

	Yes the confusion that the two different names causes (and the consequent
volume of -questions mail on the topic) is an excellent example of why it's
a bad idea. Thanks for the support. :)

Doug


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37724B77.781378DB>