Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:10:22 +1100 From: Michael Vince <mv@roq.com> To: Joao Barros <joao.barros@gmail.com> Cc: Rich Murphey <Rich@whiteoaklabs.com>, Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysql performance tuning @ FreeBSD6 Message-ID: <43D9AB3E.3020806@roq.com> In-Reply-To: <70e8236f0601261704y5e64013elfb36ec99b409e171@mail.gmail.com> References: <43D92D49.4060908@WhiteOakLabs.com> <43D95B6B.8070501@rogers.com> <70e8236f0601261704y5e64013elfb36ec99b409e171@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joao Barros wrote: >On 1/26/06, Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> wrote: > > >>Rich Murphey wrote: >> >> >>>I'm curious whether Robert's patch might have an >>>effect on samba3 performance as well. >>> >>> >>No real difference here, tried ACPI-fast, i8254, and TSC. :( My >>transfers still average at 10MB/s (although it did peak at 20MB/s once) >>Which is really horrible for a em gigabit link with jumbo frames >>enabled. The performance of Samba on FreeBSD just stinks, for unknown >>reasons. >> >> > >No real difference here too... > >I started a thread on that subject not long ago and following Robert's >tip setting net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0 yielded better results. > >-- >Joao Barros >_______________________________________________ > > With the new TCP/IP stack replacement and major updates to the em driver in FreeBSD -current this should all turn around. I believe I saw a cvs commit for em a little while ago saying the new em driver can achieve higher transfer rates then using em with polling enabled. Hopefully this stuff will make it into 6.1-Release Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43D9AB3E.3020806>