Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:24:41 -0700
From:      "Jin Guojun [DSD]" <j_guojun@lbl.gov>
To:        Doug Clements <dclements@linkline.com>
Cc:        agent dero <dero@bluhayz.org>
Subject:   Re: freebsd-performance Digest, Vol 4, Issue 7
Message-ID:  <3EF0BC78.59821B8C@lbl.gov>
References:  <20030614190033.7F0DE37B407@hub.freebsd.org> <20030615091254.M85497@bluhayz.org> <3EF0B507.2B1B6FDF@lbl.gov> <20030618185739.GE2215@linkline.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Clements wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:52:55AM -0700, Jin Guojun [DSD] wrote:
> > Recently, we tested software RAID via CCD and VINUM, and compared
> > them to adaptec 2xxx RAID controller. The performance is the same.
> > The CPU are Xeon 2.8 GHz, SuperMicro MB with ServerWork Chipset.
> > Seagate 3147xxxxLC drives.
> >
> > Problem is the write is slow for all of them, especially when multiple writes.
> >
> > Heard from Adaptect that their 5400 RAID has best performance, but
> > never had one for testing.
> >
> > So, soft RAID is ok to save bucks for hardware.
>
> How was CPU usage during the tests?

Very minimum.
It was slow on SCSI bus , but I do not have time to diagnose,
which can be very time consuming.

    -Jin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EF0BC78.59821B8C>