Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 17:43:01 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255846] x11-themes/kde-icons-noia: Add LICENSE, Take MAINTAINERship Message-ID: <bug-255846-7788-yPh3WtE3wr@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-255846-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-255846-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255846 --- Comment #9 from Chris Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> --- (In reply to Tobias Kortkamp from comment #8) Thanks for your attention to this, Tobias. I guess I'm a bit confused. All I'm really suggesting is to drag the LICENSE conditional block out of the Makefile.icons file, and put it into each of the Makefiles that *don't* have a license defined within their source. I only started down this trail; as pkg-fallout suddenly started spamming my mailbox with failures for the kde-icons-nuovext2 that I maintain. Curious, as it had worked for several years w/o problems and nothing in the port had changed. So as I looked into it I discovered that a couple others had a license defined/included. But weren't used. So thought I should define them within their Makefile' with the license included with the source, and drag the conditional license block out of Makefile.icons and place it into those that _don't_ come with a license defined. It won't change the "no dist" definition in any way. It just seems to make it easier to actually define a license when one is defined/included within the source. Am I missing something? Thanks again, Tobias. --Chris --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-255846-7788-yPh3WtE3wr>